Short answer
Muris muvazaası concerns an apparent transaction alleged to conceal the deceased owner’s true intention to deprive heirs of inheritance. A transfer to one child does not, by itself, establish that allegation. This guide concerns property disputes under Turkish law.
The recorded sale and the intended transaction
A transfer completed years earlier can become disputed when an inheritance opens. A document may record a sale while the parties allegedly intended a gift designed to exclude heirs. However, saying “my parent transferred the home to my sibling” does not identify the legal basis. Establish the date, the official deed and the property’s condition at that time. An express gift, a genuine sale and a gift concealed by an apparent sale require different analysis.
Read the evidence as a whole
A substantial difference between the recorded price and the contemporary value can matter, but does not determine every case on its own. The buyer’s ability to pay, the payment method, the deceased’s reason for selling, family relationships and other assets are considered together. A claim of cash payment needs supporting circumstances. Care provided to the deceased can also help explain the transaction. Family disagreements do not create an automatic rule of proof.
A sham-transfer claim is different from reduction of gifts
Believing that an inheritance share was reduced does not automatically identify the right claim. Muris muvazaası and a claim protecting a reserved inheritance share involve different legal questions. Heirship, the transfer, subsequent owners and the requested remedy must be examined together. A judgment involving another family cannot simply be transplanted to a similar story. Identifying the proper defendants and the registration requested also requires more than choosing a lawsuit title.
Bring a timeline to the first meeting
Prepare the inheritance certificate, current and earlier registry records, official deed, available payment evidence and relevant correspondence. Record transfer dates, the date of death and later sales separately. Distinguish what you personally know from what someone later told you. A witness’s account of a specific event is more useful than an opinion that a relative acted unfairly. Any risk of a further transfer may require separate interim-protection advice. Claims, time limits and likely outcomes require individual assessment; this guide is general information.
Consultation preparation checklist
- Inheritance certificate and a short chronology of transfers
- Registry records, official deed and available payment evidence
- Relevant correspondence and witnesses with direct knowledge
Frequently asked questions
Is every sale to a child a disguised inheritance transfer?
No. The real intention and the allegation of excluding heirs must be assessed through the circumstances and evidence as a whole.
Is a low sale price sufficient on its own?
Not in every case. Payment, value, financial circumstances and the parties’ relationship require joint assessment.
Sources and relevant legislation
- Turkish Civil Code No. 4721 — Ministry of Justice
- Judicial assessment of concealed inheritance transfers — UYAP
Source review and preparation: October 17, 2026. Legislation and practice can change; the current text and individual circumstances must be reviewed before applying.
This article is a general information publication by Hukukofis; it is not individual advice from a lawyer or a guarantee of results. For verified education details of the office’s lawyer, see our lawyer’s profile.